Open AccessGrading AG Szpunar's Opinion in Case C-18/18 – A Caution against Worldwide Content Blocking as Default
Author(s) -
Dan Jerker B. Svantesson
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
masaryk university journal of law and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.186
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1802-5951
pISSN - 1802-5943
DOI - 10.5817/mujlt2019-2-10
Subject(s) - jurisdiction , scope (computer science) , law , grading (engineering) , economic justice , political science , the internet , preliminary ruling , european union , business , computer science , international trade , civil engineering , world wide web , programming language , engineering
On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe.This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.