Open AccessUltrasonic Evaluation of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome
Author(s) -
Jichen Wang,
Shun Cai,
Chen Su,
Heng Fan,
Yonghao Gai,
Guangchuan Wang,
Li Chen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iranian journal of radiology./iranian journal of radiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.12
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 2008-2711
pISSN - 1735-1065
DOI - 10.5812/iranjradiol.103658
Subject(s) - medicine , inferior vena cava , radiology , budd–chiari syndrome , portosystemic shunt , ultrasound , digital subtraction angiography , angiography , cirrhosis , portal hypertension
Background: Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are one of the hallmarks of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Ultrasound can accurately show the location and type of portosystemic collaterals. Objectives: To study the sonographic feature of SPSS in patients with BCS and to evaluate differences in the main portal vein diameter among multiple types of portosystemic shunts. Patients and Methods: Ultrasonographies of 44 patients with SPSS among 352 BCS patients between June 2000 and November 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The SPSS in 44 BCS patients were first detected by ultrasound and then confirmed via digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance venography (MRV). The location, course, diameter and hemodynamics of the spontaneous portosystemic shunts were observed by ultrasound. In addition, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the difference in the main portal vein diameter between the different shunt types. Results: The blood drainage patterns of SPSS in 44 of 352 patients with BCS were classified as the following five types: portal-umbilical shunts (15/44), portal-hepatic shunts (11/44), portal-accessory hepatic shunts (6/44) (the accessory hepatic veins included the inferior right hepatic vein and the caudate lobe vein), splenorenal shunts (8/44) and main portal vein-inferior vena cava shunts (4/44). The corresponding hemodynamics of the five types mentioned above were obtained. Main portal vein-inferior vena cava shunts had a significantly larger mean portal trunk diameter compared with all other types (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). In addition, the mean portal trunk diameters in portal-umbilical shunts and portal-hepatic shunts were obviously larger than that of splenorenal shunts (P < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences between the other types. Conclusion: Spontaneous portosystemic shunts are not rare in patients with BCS. Ultrasound is a reliable means for their diagnosis and it offers substantial information for use in clinical treatment.