Open AccessDA PROIBIÇÃO DO RETROCESSO NA DEFESA DO CONSUMIDOR:DISCUSSÃO SOBRE O PL 1179/2020
Author(s) -
Lícia Pimentel Marconi,
Myllena Silva,
Sílvia M. Miranda,
Thamires Isabele Novais Silva
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
colloquium socialis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2526-7035
DOI - 10.5747/cs.2020.v4.n4.s121
Subject(s) - decree , context (archaeology) , legislature , product (mathematics) , service (business) , political science , state (computer science) , regret , consumer protection , purchasing , law , public administration , sociology , business , law and economics , history , marketing , geometry , mathematics , archaeology , algorithm , machine learning , computer science
This article intends to bring to discussion the reality that was imposed early in the beginning of the year 2020, more precisely in March, with the state of public calamity worldwide installed and decreed in Brazil and the essential need to regulate relations in different sectors of society in due to the pandemic;in Brazil, immediately the Legislative Power, on the initiative of Senator Antonio Anastasia -PSD / MG, presented a law project of number 1179/2020 with a proposal to regulate thetransitional relations resulting from the impacts caused by the decree of the pandemic.In this context, the article seeks to tackle concepts, legal institutes, factual situations to discuss one of the subjects affected with the pandemic, specifically theconsumer and his right of regret when purchasing a product or service, considering that one of the points discussed in the respective project on the agenda is the provision on the provisional suspension of the provision provided for in article 49 of the Consumer Protection Code -CDC -regarding the return period in the event of a product or service purchased by home delivery, more specifically delivery.In this perspective the present article resides, in analyzing how much this forecast, albeit transitory, and in order to placate the critical effects generated by the decree of the state of calamity, due to the action of COVID-19, represents a setback to the consumer rights.