Open AccessPRESCRIÇÃO DE ANTIBIÓTICOS DE USO HUMANO PARA FINS DE TERAPIA ANIMAL
Author(s) -
Maria Eduarda Canôa Bertão,
Daniel Andrade da Silva,
Willian Marinho Dourado Coelho
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
colloquium agrariae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1809-8215
DOI - 10.5747/ca.2018.v14.nesp.000257
Subject(s) - ampicillin , medicine , antibiotics , ciprofloxacin , norfloxacin , amoxicillin , sparfloxacin , ofloxacin , moxifloxacin , tobramycin , bacitracin , cefadroxil , gentamicin , microbiology and biotechnology , cephalosporin , biology
The objective of this study was to quantify human antibacterial prescriptions for animal therapy. Itbegan on April 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017, in the cities of Andradina-SP, Castilho-SP,Inocência-MS, Nova Independência-SP and Três Lagoas-MS, with the cooperation of fourteendrugstores in the respective cities , which contributed to the completion of a form composed ofdata from the establishment and antibiotics prescribed by Veterinary Doctors, were collected oncea month (Fig. 1), listed in active principles, accounting for Doxycycline 23.7%, Cephalexin 16.2%Rifamycin 14.4%, Sufamethoxazole + Trimetropim 9.27%, Tobramycin 7.9%, Metronidazole 6.9%,Chloramphenicol 4.8%, Neomycin 3.86%, Ciprofloxacin 3.6%, Amoxicillin 2.31%, Gentamicin 2.0%,Gatilfloxacin 1.3%, Ampicillin, Azithromycin, Ceftriaxone, Norfloxacin 0.51%, Bacitracin, Cefadroxil,Moxifloxacin, Nitrofural, Ofloxacin and Terramycin 0.25% (Tab.1). It is concluded that theknowledge of the general principles of antibiotics without therapeutic follow-up and irrational useof antibiotics is unsatisfactory.