z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DIÂMETRO FOLICULAR E TAXA DE PRENHEZ EM PROTOCOLO DE SINCRONIZAÇÃO COM GnRH OU BENZOATO DE ESTRADIOL NO DIA 0 EM VACAS DE CORTE
Author(s) -
Ana Paula da Silveira,
Marina de Castro Martins,
Luiz Roberto A. Gabriel Filho,
Caliê Castilho
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
colloquium agrariae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1809-8215
DOI - 10.5747/ca.2011.v07.n2.a070
Subject(s) - biology
This work aimed to evaluate the pregnancy rate and follicular diameter using EB or GnRH on the insertion of progesterone implant (D0) in lactating beef cows. Two groups were tested in two experiments. In Exp. 1 were used 61 Nelore cows divided into two groups: G-BE (n = 32) and G-GnRH (n = 29), on D0 was inserted P4 implant (CIDR®) and applied 2 mL of BE (G-BE) or 2.5 mL GnRH (G-GnRH). In D9 was performed ultrasonography (U.S.) to measure the diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary and the implant was removed, with concomitant administration of 2.5 mL of PGF2α and estradiol cypionate (ECP®) followed by calves removal. After 48 hours all the cows were inseminated and the calves returned. In Exp. 2 50 cows were used following the same protocol described above, but the pregnancy was assessed without performing ovarian US. There was no difference (p>0.05) in pregnancy rate between treatments, BE (55%) or GnRH (41%), but the follicular diameter was significantly higher (p<0.05) in pregnant cows treated with EB (10.7 mm vs. 8.5 mm) and in cows treated with GnRH there was no difference (p>0.05) between pregnant and no pregnant cows (11.6 mm vs. 10.2 mm). We concluded the use of GnRH on D0 did not improve the pregnancy rate in lactating beef cows and follicular diameter was greater (p <0.05) in pregnant cows compared to non-pregnant only in G-BE

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here