
Dissipation Profile and Human Risk Assessment of Pyrimethanil Residues in Cucumbers and Strawberries
Author(s) -
Farag Malhat,
Naglaa Loutfy,
Wasfy Thabet
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of health and pollution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.412
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2156-9614
DOI - 10.5696/2156-9614-4-7.36
Subject(s) - pyrimethanil , environmental science , environmental chemistry , chemistry , food science , biology , horticulture , fungicide
Background. The present investigation was undertaken to study the persistence of pyrimethanil in strawberries and cucumbers following good agricultural practices under field conditions. A secondary objective was to validate a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method for the determination of pyrimethanil levels in strawberries and cucumbers using high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection.Methods. Pyrimethanil (20% wettable power (WP)) was sprayed on strawberries and cucumbers grown under field conditions at the dosage recommended by the manufacturer. The dissipation rates of pyrimethanil were described using first-order kinetics and its half-life was 2.9 days in strawberries and 2.2 days in cucumbers. A risk assessment was performed using the risk quotient (RQ).Results. At fortification levels of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg in strawberries and cucumbers, recoveries ranged from 90.1 to 109% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) ranging from 2.0–7.9%, which is within the acceptable limits for routine analysis of pyrimethanil residues. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was established at 0.05 mg/kg. The results showed that the RQ value was significantly lower than 1.Conclusions. The results of the present study suggest that the risk of pyrimethanil use in strawberries and cucumbers at the recommended dosage is negligible to humans. This study could provide guidance for the safe and reasonable use of pyrimethanil in strawberries and cucumbers to prevent health problems in consumers.Competing Interests. The authors declare no competing financial interests