Premium
Discharge destination and patient‐reported outcomes after inpatient treatment for isolated lower limb fractures
Author(s) -
Kimmel Lara A,
Simpson Pamela M,
Holland Anne E,
Edwards Elton R,
Cameron Peter A,
Steiger Richard S,
Page Richard S,
Hau Raphael,
Bucknill Andrew,
Kasza Jessica,
Gabbe Belinda J
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/mja2.50485
Subject(s) - propensity score matching , medicine , rehabilitation , odds ratio , odds , physical therapy , confidence interval , emergency medicine , logistic regression
Objectives To examine the association between discharge destination (home or inpatient rehabilitation) for adult patients treated in hospital for isolated lower limb fractures and patient‐reported outcomes. Design Review of prospectively collected Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry ( VOTOR ) data. Setting, participants Adults (18–64 years old) treated for isolated lower limb fractures at four Melbourne trauma hospitals that contribute data to the VOTOR , 1 March 2007 – 31 March 2016. Main outcome measures Return to work and functional recovery (assessed with the extended Glasgow Outcomes Scale, GOS ‐E); propensity score analysis of association between discharge destination and outcome. Results Of 7961 eligible patients, 1432 (18%) were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation, and 6775 (85%) were followed up 12 months after their injuries. After propensity score adjustment, the odds of better functional recovery were 56% lower for patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation than for those discharged directly home (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI , 0.37–0.51); for the 5057 people working before their accident, the odds of return to work were reduced by 66% (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% CI , 0.26–0.46). Propensity score analysis improved matching of the discharge destination groups, but imbalances in funding source remained for both outcome analyses, and for also for site and cause of injury in the GOS ‐E analysis (standardised differences, 10–16%). Conclusions Discharge to inpatient rehabilitation after treatment for isolated lower limb fractures was associated with poorer outcomes than discharge home. Factors that remained unbalanced after propensity score analysis could be assessed in controlled trials.