z-logo
Premium
Should general practitioners order troponin tests?
Author(s) -
Marshall George A,
Wijeratne Nilika G,
Thomas Devika
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/mja13.00173
Subject(s) - troponin , medicine , myocardial infarction , asymptomatic , troponin i , test (biology) , acute coronary syndrome , intensive care medicine , cardiology , myocardial infarction diagnosis , paleontology , biology
Summary Cardiac troponin I and T are the preferred biomarkers for assessing myocardial injury, and the timing of troponin testing is fundamental to its clinical utility. There are arguments for and against the use of troponin testing in the community, and the stance that general practitioners should never order a troponin test can be considered an oversimplification. GPs have a generally sufficient understanding of the test for use in primary care, and have a better understanding of false‐negative troponin test results than false‐positive results. We suggest that hospitalisation, rather than troponin testing, should be the default option for patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. A single troponin test is reasonable in primary care to exclude the possibility of acute myocardial infarction in asymptomatic low‐risk patients whose symptoms resolved at least 12 hours prior. GPs should factor in the complex logistics of troponin testing in the community before ordering a troponin test: results need to be accurate and timely, and might be obtained at a time of day when it is difficult to contact the doctor or the patient.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here