z-logo
Premium
Impact of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays on patients presenting to an emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome
Author(s) -
Yip Thomas P Y,
Pascoe Heather M,
Lane Stephen E
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/mja13.00117
Subject(s) - emergency department , acute coronary syndrome , medicine , troponin , cardiology , medical emergency , emergency medicine , myocardial infarction , psychiatry
Objective: To determine whether introduction of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTn‐I) assays affected management of patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary referral hospital. Design, patients and setting: A retrospective analysis of all patients presenting to the Geelong Hospital ED with suspected ACS from 23 April 2010 to 22 April 2013 —2 years before and 1 year after the changeover to hscTn‐I assays on 23 April 2012. Main outcome measures: Hospital admission rates, time spent in the ED, rates of coronary angiography, rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS), rates of discharge with a diagnosis of ACS, and rates of inhospital mortality. Results: 12 360 consecutive patients presented with suspected ACS during the study period; 1897 were admitted to Geelong Hospital in the 2 years before and 944 in the 1 year after the changeover to hscTn‐I assays. Comparing the two patient groups, there was no statistically significant difference in all‐hospital admission rates (95% CI for the difference, − 3.1% to 0.3%; P  = 0.10) or proportion of patients subsequently discharged with a diagnosis of ACS (95% CI for the difference, − 2.3% to 5.4%; P  = 0.43). After the changeover, the median time patients spent in the ED was 11.5% shorter (3.85 h v 4.35 h; 95% CI for the difference, − 0.59 to  − 0.43; P  < 0.001) and the proportion of admitted patients undergoing coronary angiography was higher (53.4% v 45.2%; 95% CI for the difference, 4.3 to 12.0 percentage points; P  < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant rise in the proportion of patients who had invasive treatment (PCI and/or CABGS) (95% CI for the difference, − 0.4% to 6.3%; P  = 0.08). Inhospital mortality rates from ACS did not change significantly (95% CI for the difference, − 1.5% to 0.8%; P  = 0.43). Conclusion: The introduction of hscTn‐I assays appeared to be associated with more rapid diagnosis, resulting in less time spent in the ED, without a change in hospital admission rates. A higher proportion of patients had coronary angiographies after the changeover, but there was no significant change in rates of invasive treatment or inhospital mortality.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here