Adhesive tape in the health care setting: another high‐risk fomite?

TO THE EDITOR: We read with interest the article by Pinto and colleagues regarding colonisation of reusable tourniquets by multiresistant organisms (MROs).1 We highlight that surgical adhesive tape also has the potential to act as a significant fomite in health care settings. We collected partially used surgical tape rolls from several clinical areas of three hospitals in the Hunter New England Area Health Service. Using hands disinfected with alcohol gel, tape rolls from different locations in each area were placed into 21 clean collection bags (up to three tapes per bag). Tapes from each batch were placed in 21 sterile containers with 15 mL of brain–heart infusion broth and incubated overnight at 35C in carbon dioxide. The broths were subcultured onto Columbia horseblood agar (Oxoid Australia, Adelaide, SA), MacConkey agar (Oxoid) and differential selective media to detect vancomycinresistant enterococci (VRE) (chromID VRE; bioMérieux, Marcy L’Étoile, France), methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Brilliance MRSA; Oxoid) and multiresistant gram-negative bacteria (chromID ESBL; bioMérieux). A multiplex tandem polymerase chain reaction assay (MRSA4; AusDiagnostics, Sydney, NSW) to detect MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was also performed on all broth cultures. Routine species level identification was performed (VITEK MS; bioMérieux). Susceptibility was determined in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.2 In 11 of the 21 tape batches, MRSA and/or VRE were identified. Of these, four were positive for MRSA and 10 for VRE, with three positive for both. MSSA was identified in two, both in association with VRE. All batches showed evidence of contamination with other bacteria such as Bacillus cereus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, non-multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp, Acinetobacter spp and other enterococci. Our results indicate that surgical adhesive tapes are frequently contaminated with MROs. Interpretation of these results is limited by the small number of tapes and clinical areas sampled, and the difficulty of proving a relationship to clinical infection. However, items such as intravenous cannulae, surgical drains and wound dressings are frequently fixed using surgical adhesive tape. This may lead to colonisation and subsequent infection. Furthermore, tape rolls are often left lying on contaminated surfaces, are handled by multiple individuals and cannot be disinfected. Surgical adhesive tape is a potential reservoir of pathogenic bacteria3 and fungi4 and was implicated in a prolonged S. aureus outbreak in a neonatal unit.5 The role of surgical tape as a potential fomite was reported in 19746 but has not been widely acknowledged since. Removing the outer layer of the tape roll is unlikely to reduce contamination, given visible contamination of the side of many rolls (Figure).3 Short rolls of surgical adhesive tape should be supplied in Letters