z-logo
Premium
Improving paediatric asthma outcomes in primary health care: a randomised controlled trial
Author(s) -
Shah Smita,
Sawyer Susan M,
Toelle Brett G,
Mellis Craig M,
Peat Jennifer K,
Lagleva Marivic,
Usherwood Timothy P,
Jenkins Christine R
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/mja10.11422
Subject(s) - medicine , asthma , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , physical therapy , family medicine , receipt , pediatrics , nursing , world wide web , computer science
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Practitioner Asthma Communication and Education (PACE) Australia program, an innovative communication and paediatric asthma management program for general practitioners. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: General practices from two regions in metropolitan Sydney. Participants: 150 GPs, who were recruited between 2006 and 2008, and 221 children with asthma in their care. Intervention: GPs in the intervention group participated in two 3‐hour workshops, focusing on communication and education strategies to facilitate quality asthma care. Main outcome measures: Patient outcomes included receipt of a written asthma action plan (WAAP), appropriate medication use, parent days away from work, and child days away from school or child care. GP outcomes included frequency of providing a WAAP and patient education, communication and teaching behaviour, and adherence to national asthma guidelines regarding medication use. Results: More patients of GPs in the intervention group reported receipt of a WAAP (difference, 15%; 95% CI, 2% to 28%; adjusted P = 0.046). In the intervention group, children with infrequent intermittent asthma symptoms had lower use of inhaled corticosteroids (difference, 24%; 95% CI, − 43% to − 5%; P = 0.03) and long‐acting bronchodilators (difference, 19%; 95% CI, − 34% to − 5%; P = 0.02). GPs in the intervention group were more confident when communicating with patients (difference 22%; 95% CI, 3% to 40%; P = 0.03). A higher proportion of GPs in the intervention group reported providing a WAAP more than 70% of the time (difference, 23%; 95% CI, 11% to 36%; adjusted P = 0.002) and prescribing spacer devices more than 90% of the time (difference, 29%; 95% CI, 16% to 42%; adjusted P = 0.02). Conclusions: The PACE Australia program improved GPs’ asthma management practices and led to improvements in some important patient outcomes. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12607000067471.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom