Premium
Prevention before profits: a levy on food and alcohol advertising
Author(s) -
Harper Todd A,
Mooney Gavin
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03564.x
Subject(s) - business , marketing , purchasing , incentive , advertising , consumption (sociology) , population , promotion (chess) , alcohol industry , environmental health , economics , medicine , social science , sociology , politics , political science , law , microeconomics
The recent interest in health promotion and disease prevention has drawn attention to the role of the alcohol and junk‐food industries. Companies supplying, producing, advertising or selling alcohol or junk food (ie, foods with a high content of fat, sugar or salt) do so to generate profits. Even companies marketing “low‐carbohydrate” beers, “mild” cigarettes, or “high‐fibre” sugary cereals are not primarily concerned about population health, more so increased sales and profits. In a competitive market, it is assumed that consumers make fully informed choices about costs and benefits before purchasing. However, consumers are not being fully informed of the implications of their junk‐food and alcohol choices, as advertising of these products carries little information on the health consequences of consumption. We propose that there should be a levy on advertising expenditure for junk food and alcoholic beverages to provide an incentive for industry to promote healthier products. Proceeds of the levy could be used to provide consumers with more complete and balanced information on the healthy and harmful impacts of food and alcohol choices. Our proposal addresses two of the greatest challenges facing Australia's preventable disease epidemic — the imbalance between the promotion of healthier and unhealthy products, and securing funds to empower consumer choice.