Premium
Vaccination and screening of medical students: results of a student health initiative
Author(s) -
Torda Adrienne J
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02139.x
Subject(s) - medicine , vaccination , rubella , measles , hepatitis b , hepatitis a , hbsag , hepatitis b virus , immunology , immunity , pediatrics , hepatitis , immune system , virus
Objective: To evaluate the immune status and vaccination needs of first‐year medical students in relation to bloodborne viruses and common vaccine‐preventable diseases. Design, setting and participants: Survey of first‐year medical students at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, attending a mandatory screening and vaccination clinic, 2002–2005. Main outcome measures: Self‐reported history of vaccination or natural infection; serological evidence of immunity to measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (presence of specific IgG) and hepatitis B (presence of hepatitis B virus surface antibodies) or infection with hepatitis B and C viruses and HIV; and Mantoux test results. Results: 733 students attended the clinic (85% of those enrolled). Four students were positive for HBsAg and four had hepatitis C antibodies. None were HIV‐positive. Twenty‐nine per cent (216/733) were not immune to hepatitis B, 33% (238/724) to mumps, 26% (190/724) to measles, 13% (91/724) to rubella and 10% (75/724) to varicella. About 23% (91/237) needed further testing for tuberculosis. Immunity corresponded poorly with self‐reported history of vaccination. More students reported vaccination against rubella (96%), measles (81%) and mumps (80%) than were immune, and fewer reported vaccination against hepatitis B (44%). Conclusions: Many students were not immune to vaccine‐preventable diseases, and a small number had a previously undiagnosed bloodborne virus infection (hepatitis B or C). The level of immunity to vaccine‐preventable infections was unacceptable and justified the provision of an easily accessible program for screening and vaccination.