Premium
Venous thromboembolism — a major health and financial burden: how can we do better to prevent this disease?
Author(s) -
Chong Beng H,
Braithwaite Jeffrey,
Harris Mark F,
Fletcher John P
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01943.x
Subject(s) - george (robot) , library science , medicine , management , family medicine , art , art history , computer science , economics
Venous thromboembolism — a major health and financial burden: how can we do better to prevent this disease? VTE prophylaxis is effective and safe, but grossly underused in Australian hospitals n this issue of the Journal, Ho and colleagues (page 144) report their findings from a Perth community-based study of venous thromboembolism (VTE). 1 They found an incidence of VTE, which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69–0.97) per 1000 population per year. This figure is consistent with hospital discharge data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, which predict an estimated 14 716 VTE cases in 2008 2 or an incidence of 0.74 per 1000. This incidence comes with high costs to Australian society in terms of deaths, morbidity and health care expenditure. VTE is a major cause of hospital deaths — Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data indicate that 7% of all deaths in Australian hospitals are due to VTE, 2 and autopsy studies suggest the percentage may be as high as 10%. 3 Thus, VTE causes more deaths than any common cancer (breast, lung, prostate or bowel) and is 40 times more deadly than HIV/AIDS in Australia. VTE also causes significant long-term morbidity from post-thrombotic syndrome (chronic leg swelling, pain and skin ulcers) and pulmonary hypertension. A report by Access Economics estimated that the cost to Australia of treating VTE is currently $1.72 billion annually (0.15% of gross domestic product). 2 This estimate includes costs attributable to direct health system expenditure ($148 million), productivity loss ($1.38 billion) and efficiency loss ($162 million). If costs relating to premature mortality are included, then VTE represents the most costly disease burden among the 16 diseases (including cancer, dementia, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and schizophrenia) that have been studied and ranked by Access Economics in recent years. The key to saving lives, improving patient outcomes and reducing the huge financial cost to individuals and the nation lies in prevention of this disease. Evidence-based findings from well designed studies have clearly shown that prevention is possible. 4,5 With a modest outlay, VTE incidence can be significantly reduced, effectively and safely, using anticoagulants such as unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins, or, particularly if a risk of bleeding exists, by mechanical means (compression stockings and intermittent calf compression). However, current data suggest that VTE prophylaxis is grossly underused in hospitals in Australia and overseas. 6 The ENDORSE study (which …