Premium
The rights and interests of doctors and patients: does the new Victorian Health Professions Registration Act 2005 strike a fair balance?
Author(s) -
Middleton Sarah L,
Pearce Thomas D,
Buist Michael D
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00861.x
Subject(s) - conciliation , appeal , tribunal , government (linguistics) , law , balance (ability) , argument (complex analysis) , power (physics) , political science , arbitration , medicine , philosophy , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics , physical medicine and rehabilitation
From July 2007, the Health Professions Registration Act 2005 (Vic) will significantly alter the medical disciplinary process in Victoria. For practitioners: Formal hearings for allegations of serious unprofessional conduct will be heard by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT); There will be no right of appeal from a VCAT decision other than on a point of law; The maximum fine for serious unprofessional conduct will increase from $2000 to $50 000; Performance standards panels (PSPs) will be established to conduct informal hearings, with a power to impose conditions on registration; and Costs of the new system will cause an increase in annual registration fees.For complainants: There are new avenues for conciliation; There is a right to seek a review of certain Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria decisions; and Reasons for a PSP decision will be provided.Despite government argument that these changes will make the health complaints handling system fairer, the new Act has the potential to diminish the rights and interests of doctors.