Premium
Clinical guidelines: what can we do to increase their use?
Author(s) -
Grol Richard,
Buchan Heather
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00580.x
Subject(s) - chief executive officer , officer , citation , library science , medical journal , political science , medicine , management , law , computer science , economics
n the past decade, evidence-based clinical guidelines have become a major feature of health care. Researchers and clinicians in many countries have established programs to summarise the evidence for managing specific health problems and to disseminate practice guidelines. However, clinical use of guideline recommendations does not necessarily follow. Numerous studies show that recommendations are frequently not applied in practice and that many patients do not profit from evidence-based insights. 1 Large variations in performance between clinicians, practices and institutions are commonly observed. Two reports in this issue of the Journal on pages 305 and 310 illustrate this well. 2,3 In the first, an audit in a hospital outpatient clinic showed that large numbers of patients with diabetes do not achieve recommended treatment targets for control of glycaemia, blood pressure and lipid levels, despite evidence that control of these risk factors produces better outcomes. 2 The second, a study of six Australian dialysis units, showed that, despite high levels of awareness of iron guideline recommendations in participating units, there is considerable variation in achievement of targets and widely differing practices in unit processes for iron management. 3