Premium
Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients
Author(s) -
Stewart Grant D,
Long Gareth,
Tulloh Bruce R
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00507.x
Subject(s) - centralisation , metropolitan area , medicine , rural population , service (business) , rural area , population , quality of life (healthcare) , quality (philosophy) , balance (ability) , medical emergency , business , nursing , environmental health , political science , marketing , physical therapy , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , law
High patient volume for both hospitals and surgeons is an important determinant of operative mortality and outcome for complex and infrequently performed operations. The 13% of Australia's population who live in rural and remote areas often choose to have surgery close to home and support networks despite the potentially higher operative mortality and morbidity. Rural patients should be able to make an informed choice about having their surgery locally. Rural and metropolitan surgeons should discuss and reach mutual agreement on where each patient is best treated. A balance must be struck between quality of services that can be provided locally and geographic convenience.