Premium
Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Indigenous Western Australians: comparison between urban and remote rural populations
Author(s) -
Mayers Naomi R,
Couzos Sophie,
Murray Richard,
Daniels John
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00026.x
Subject(s) - indigenous , officer , library science , community health , public health , medicine , sociology , management , family medicine , political science , law , nursing , ecology , computer science , economics , biology
OBJECTIVESTo determine and compare the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in an urban and a remote rural Western Australian Indigenous community.DESIGNCross-sectional study of Helicobacter pylori status determined by urea breath tests between mid-January 2003 and the end of June 2004.PARTICIPANTS520 self-selected fasting participants, comprising 270 members of the Martu community at Jigalong, Punmu and Parnngurr in the East Pilbara region (129 men, 141 women; age range, 2-90 years) and 250 people from the Perth Indigenous community (96 men, 154 women; age range, 3-75 years.RESULTSThe overall prevalence of H. pylori was 76%, but the prevalence in the remote rural community was 91%, compared with 60% in the urban community. The odds of having H. pylori were six times greater for rural than for urban participants (odds ratio [OR], 6.34; 95% CI, 3.89-10.33). Further, the overall odds of H. pylori infection in males (rural and urban combined) were greater than for females (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02-2.54). In both communities, the prevalence of infection remained relatively constant after the age of 10.CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence of H. pylori in the two Indigenous communities was two to three times higher than that in the non-Indigenous Australian population and higher than that shown in previous studies in Indigenous Australians.