z-logo
Premium
Point‐of‐care testing of HbA1c and blood glucose in a remote Aboriginal Australian community
Author(s) -
Martin David D,
Jones Timothy W,
Davis Elizabeth A,
Shephard Mark D S,
Freeman Hayley,
Maguire Graeme P,
Bulsara Max K
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00019.x
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetes mellitus , point of care , point of care testing , venous blood , plasma glucose , analyser , glucose meter , population , mean difference , limits of agreement , endocrinology , chromatography , nuclear medicine , chemistry , confidence interval , pathology , environmental health
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of point‐of‐care (POC) measurements of capillary blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) levels in a remote Aboriginal community with high diabetes prevalence. Design: Cross‐sectional study comparing POC capillary glucose and HbA 1c results with those from corresponding venous samples measured in a reference laboratory. Participants and setting: 152 residents aged 11–76 years (representing 76% of population aged over 11 years) had POC glucose measurement in November 2003; 88 with POC glucose level ≥ 5.0 mmol/L, or self‐reported diabetes, had POC HbA 1c and laboratory glucose and HbA 1c measurements. Main outcome measures: POC fasting capillary levels of glucose (HemoCue Glucose 201 analyser, Medipac Scientific, Sydney) and HbA 1c (DCA 2000+ analyser, Bayer Australia, Melbourne); correlation and mean difference between capillary POC and venous blood laboratory measurements of glucose and HbA 1c . Results: Mean and median POC capillary glucose levels were 7.99 mmol/L and 6.25 mmol/L, respectively, while mean and median laboratory venous plasma glucose concentrations were 7.63 mmol/L and 5.35 mmol/L. Values for POC capillary HbA 1c and laboratory HbA 1c were identical: mean, 7.06%; and median, 6.0%. The correlation coefficient r for POC and laboratory results was 0.98 for glucose and 0.99 for HbA 1c . The mean difference in results was 0.36 mmol/L for glucose (95% CI, 0.13–0.62; limits of agreement [LOA], − 2.07 to 2.79 mmol/L; P = 0.007) and < 0.01% for HbA 1c (95% CI, − 0.07% to 0.07%; LOA, − 0.66% to 0.66%; P = 0.95), respectively. Conclusions: POC capillary HbA 1c testing, in particular, offers an accurate, practical, community‐friendly way of monitoring diabetes in rural and remote clinical settings. POC capillary glucose results should be confirmed by a laboratory test of venous plasma if the results are likely to significantly influence clinical decisions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here