z-logo
Premium
Exposure to bushfire smoke and asthma: an ecological study
Author(s) -
Johnston Fay H,
Kavanagh Anne M,
Bowman David M J S,
Scott Randall K
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04551.x
Subject(s) - smoke , asthma , ecology , environmental science , geography , environmental health , biology , meteorology , medicine , immunology
Objective: To examine the relationship between the mean daily concentration of respirable particles arising from bushfire smoke and hospital presentations for asthma. Design and setting: An ecological study conducted in Darwin (Northern Territory, Australia) from 1 April – 31 October 2000, a period characterised by minimal rainfall and almost continuous bushfire activity in the proximate bushland. The exposure variable was the mean atmospheric concentration of particles of 10 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ) per cubic metre per 24‐hour period. Outcome measure: The daily number of presentations for asthma to the Emergency Department of Royal Darwin Hospital. Results: There was a significant increase in asthma presentations with each 10‐µg/m 3 increase in PM 10 concentration, even after adjusting for weekly rates of influenza and for weekend or weekday (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09–1.34; P < 0.001). The strongest effect was seen on days when the PM 10 was above 40 µg/m 3 (adjusted rate ratio, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.46–3.90), compared with days when PM 10 levels were less than 10 µg/m 3 . Conclusion: Airborne particulates from bushfires should be considered as injurious to human health as those from other sources. Thus, the control of smoke pollution from bushfires in urban areas presents an additional challenge for managers of fireprone landscapes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here