Premium
Manipulation of the cervical spine: a systematic review of case reports of serious adverse events, 1995–2001
Author(s) -
Ernst Edzard
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04459.x
Subject(s) - medicine , adverse effect , medline , cervical spine , cochrane library , data extraction , spinal manipulation , incidence (geometry) , stroke (engine) , cervical vertebrae , physical therapy , alternative medicine , intensive care medicine , surgery , randomized controlled trial , pathology , low back pain , political science , law , mechanical engineering , physics , optics , engineering
Objective: To summarise recent evidence from case reports (published January 1995 – September 2001) of adverse events after cervical spine manipulation. Data sources: Five computerised literature searches ( MEDLINE – Pubmed ; EMBASE , the Cochrane Library , AMED [Allied and Complementary Medicine Database] , and CISCOM [Centralised Information Service for Complementary Medicine] ) were performed. No language restrictions were applied. Study selection: All case reports containing original data of adverse events after cervical spine manipulation were included. Data extraction: All articles were evaluated and key data extracted according to pre‐defined criteria: patient's age, sex and diagnosis; type of therapist; type of treatment; nature of adverse event; method of diagnosis; and clinical outcome. Data synthesis: Thirty‐one case reports (42 individual cases) were found. The patients were equally distributed between the sexes (21 male, 20 female, one unknown) and mostly middle‐aged (range, 3 months to 87 years). Most were treated by chiropractors. Arterial dissection causing stroke was reported in at least 18 cases. Conclusions: Serious adverse events after cervical spine manipulation continue to be reported. As the incidence of these events is unknown, large and rigorous prospective studies of cervical spine manipulation are needed to accurately define the risks.