Premium
Rates of in‐hospital arrests, deaths and intensive care admissions: the effect of a medical emergency team
Author(s) -
Bristow Peter J,
HIiiman Ken M,
Daffum Kathy,
Norman Sandra L,
Bishop Gillian F,
Chey Tien,
Jacques Theresa C,
Simmons E Grant
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125627.x
Subject(s) - medicine , rapid response team , emergency medicine , odds ratio , intensive care unit , mortality rate , odds , intervention (counseling) , medical emergency , logistic regression , intensive care medicine , nursing
Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a medical emergency team (MET) in reducing the rates of selected adverse events. Design Cohort comparison study after casemix adjustment. Patients and setting All adult (≥14 years) patients admitted to three Australian public hospitals from 8 July to 31 December 1996. Intervention studied At Hospital 1, a medical emergency team (MET) could be called for abnormal physiological parameters or staff concern. Hospitals 2 and 3 had conventional cardiac arrest teams. Main outcome measures Casemix‐adjusted rates of cardiac arrest, unanticipated admission to intensive care unit (ICU), death, and the subgroup of deaths where there was no pre‐existing “do not resuscitate” (DNR) order documented. Results There were 1510 adverse events identified among 50 942 admissions. The rate of unanticipated ICU admissions was less at the intervention hospital in total (casemix‐adjusted odds ratios: Hospital 1, 1.00; Hospital 2, 1.59 [95% Cl, 1.24‐2.04]; Hospital 3, 1.73 [95% Cl, 1.37‐2.16]). There was no significant difference in the rates of cardiac arrest or total deaths between the three hospitals. However, one of the hospitals with a conventional cardiac arrest team had a higher death rate among patients without a DNR order. Conclusions The MET hospital had fewer unanticipated ICU/HOU admissions, with no increase in in‐hospital arrest rate or total death rate. The non‐DNR deaths were lower compared with one of the other hospitals; however, we did not adjust for DNR practices. We suggest that the MET concept is worthy of further study.