Premium
Doctors detected self‐administering opioids in New South Wales, 1985‐1994: characteristics and outcomes
Author(s) -
Cadman Megan,
Bell James
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb126832.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pethidine , attrition , intervention (counseling) , addiction , family medicine , controlled substance , medical prescription , emergency medicine , medical emergency , psychiatry , nursing , dentistry , analgesic
Objective To describe the characteristics and outcomes of doctors whose drug authorities were withdrawn as a result of self‐administering opioids for non‐medical purposes. Design Retrospective review of New South Wales Health Department information relating to all doctors whose authorities to possess, supply, prescribe or administer drugs of addiction had been withdrawn in the period 1985 to 1994 as a result of confirmed self‐administration of opioids. Outcome measures Age, sex, geographical location and practice category at the time of intervention; drugs used; period of opioicfiJSe before authority withdrawal; means of detection; and registration status as at August 1995. Results From 1985 to 1994, 79 doctors had their drug authorities withdrawn (0.4% of the NSW medical profession in 1994). The groups significantly over‐represented were general practitioners and those aged 30‐39 years. Pethidine was the main drug used (66 doctors; 84%). Drug use for more than two years before detection was reported by 34 (43%) doctors. Community pharmacists were the source of reports leading to detection of 28 (35%) doctors. As at August 1995, 27 (34%) of the study group were not practising; 10 (13%) had died. Conclusion Outcomes for these doctors were poor. There was substantial attrition from practice and a high mortality rate.