Premium
Clinical practice guidelines in general practice: a national survey of recall, attitudes and impact
Author(s) -
Gupta Leena,
Ward Jeanette E,
Hayward Robert S A
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138723.x
Subject(s) - guideline , recall , medicine , clinical practice , family medicine , general practice , medical education , psychology , cognitive psychology , pathology
Objective To determine Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views about and recall of clinical practice guidelines. Design Self‐administered questionnaire survey. Subjects Randomly selected Australian GPs. Results 286 of 373 GPs returned questionnaires (77% response rate). GPs' recall of each of nine guidelines ranged from 52% to 94%; 49% considered that their practice had changed as a result of a guideline. While 92% of respondents agreed that guidelines were “good educational tools”, 85% indicated that guidelines were “developed by experts who don't understand general practice”. Factors most frequently identified as important in deciding whether to follow the guideline recommendations were whether the guideline was based on evidence and credible endorsement. Conclusions Australian GPs have positive views about the purpose of clinical practice guidelines and an evidence‐based approach to guidelines development. However, respondents' rating of the perceived impact of available guidelines in everyday practice was low. The dissemination of specific guidelines is patchy and there is little evidence of systematic implementation.