Premium
An evaluation of cervical screening in general practice
Author(s) -
Lewis Deirdre,
Mitchell Heather
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb125870.x
Subject(s) - papanicolaou stain , medicine , cervical screening , graduation (instrument) , family medicine , pap smears , metropolitan area , gynecology , general practice , obstetrics , cervical cancer , pathology , geometry , mathematics , cancer
Objectives To identify the technical practices of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening, and the differences in screening practices between male and female practitioners; to determine the cellular content of smears taken; and to correlate screening practices and demographic variables with smear results. Design During February‐May 1992, a sample of Melbourne GPs filled in a questionnaire concerning their screening practices, and the results were correlated retrospectively with results of Pap smears taken in March and October 1991. Setting Melbourne metropolitan general practice. Participants One hundred and seventy‐nine GPs (72% participation rate among eligible practitioners) from a sample obtained from the register of the Medical Board of Victoria. Results Female doctors took significantly more smears than male doctors. An opportunistic approach to cervical screening was most commonly practised, with the patient being asked to ring for her results and the practice staff only contacted her if the result was abnormal. Only 43% of doctors indicated the use of a specific reminder system when rescreening was due. Endo‐cervical cells were present in 79% of smears. The presence of endocervi‐cal cells was found to be related to the year of a doctor's graduation (with both very recent and older graduates [pre‐1960s] having lower endocervical cell rates), and to be positively correlated with more postgraduate training. Conclusions Our study suggests that further education and training in cervical screening is needed for some GPs, in particular, male doctors, graduates of less than four or greater than 20 years, and those without postgraduate training.