Premium
Community Health and Medical Practitioners Scheme: providers evaluate a pilot program of integration of services
Author(s) -
Saltman Deborah C,
Sengoz Ayse,
SpencerHerrera Leslie,
Needham Lucy,
Whittington Vanessa
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
medical journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1326-5377
pISSN - 0025-729X
DOI - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137824.x
Subject(s) - community health , mental health , service provider , population , medicine , nursing , service (business) , family medicine , business , public health , environmental health , marketing , psychiatry
Objective To set up and evaluate a pilot scheme integrating salaried community health centre staff and fee‐for‐service medical practitioner services (CHAMPS). Design Preliminary interviews with both groups established the aims, logistics and financial arrangements of the project. The community health centre provided staff and the general practitioners provided premises and administrative services. Follow‐up interviews evaluated the scheme and made recommendations. Setting A New South Wales country town, population 24 000, with 25 general practitioners and 23 community health centre professionals. Results Six general practitioners and 23 community health professionals determined the aims to be: improved access for patients to community health services; improved liaison between the two groups of providers; and a broadening of services offered at general practice locations. Two dietitians and three mental health workers were rostered for half a day per week in four general practices for six months. The dietitians continued after the project finished, but the mental health workers did not. The five community health staff, five of the general practitioners originally interviewed and six other general practitioner participants cited the major benefits as increased communication between providers and improved access for patients, and the major difficulties as lack of appropriate equipment and organisational logistics. Conclusions The providers believe that the project succeeded in improving access to community health services and liaison between professionals. For future projects they recommended better communication, firmer role delineation and better planning for space and equipment.