Long-Term Objective Adherence to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea | Zendy

Grietje E. de Vries | Zendy; Aarnoud Hoekema | Zendy; Johannes Q.P.J. Claessen | Zendy; Cornelis Stellingsma | Zendy; Boudewijn Stegenga | Zendy; Huib A.M. Kerstjens | Zendy; Peter J. Wijkstra | Zendy

Open Access

Long-Term Objective Adherence to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Author(s) -

Grietje E. de Vries,

Aarnoud Hoekema,

Johannes Q.P.J. Claessen,

Cornelis Stellingsma,

Boudewijn Stegenga,

Huib A.M. Kerstjens,

Peter J. Wijkstra

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

journal of clinical sleep medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.529

H-Index - 92

eISSN - 1550-9397

pISSN - 1550-9389

DOI - 10.5664/jcsm.8034

Subject(s) - medicine , obstructive sleep apnea , oral and maxillofacial surgery , university hospital , continuous positive airway pressure , oral and maxillofacial radiology , general surgery , emergency medicine , surgery

Comparable health effects of mandibular advancement device (MAD) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy have been attributed to higher adherence with MAD compared with CPAP therapy. The objective of this study was to make a direct comparison of the objective adherence between MAD and CPAP in patients with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research