Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mandibular Advancement Device Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea | Zendy

Grietje E. de Vries | Zendy; Aarnoud Hoekema | Zendy; Karin M. Vermeulen | Zendy; Johannes Q.P.J. Claessen | Zendy; Wouter Jacobs | Zendy; Jan van der Maten | Zendy; Johannes H. van der Hoeven | Zendy; Boudewijn Stegenga | Zendy; Huib A.M. Kerstjens | Zendy; Peter J. Wijkstra | Zendy

Open Access

Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mandibular Advancement Device Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Author(s) -

Grietje E. de Vries,

Aarnoud Hoekema,

Karin M. Vermeulen,

Johannes Q.P.J. Claessen,

Wouter Jacobs,

Jan van der Maten,

Johannes H. van der Hoeven,

Boudewijn Stegenga,

Huib A.M. Kerstjens,

Peter J. Wijkstra

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

journal of clinical sleep medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.529

H-Index - 92

eISSN - 1550-9397

pISSN - 1550-9389

DOI - 10.5664/jcsm.7980

Subject(s) - medicine , obstructive sleep apnea , continuous positive airway pressure , airway , apnea , sleep apnea , sleep (system call) , anesthesia , positive airway pressure , cardiology , computer science , operating system

Limited evidence exists on the cost-effectiveness of mandibular advancement device (MAD) compared to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Therefore, this study compares the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MAD therapy with CPAP therapy in moderate OSA.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research