
Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for delivery induction among pregnant women without concomitant disease
Author(s) -
Teresa Górnisiewicz,
Katarzyna Kuśmierska-Urban,
Hubert Huras,
Aleksander Gałaś
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ginekologia polska
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.4
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 2543-6767
pISSN - 0017-0011
DOI - 10.5603/gp.2020.0119
Subject(s) - medicine , dinoprostone , misoprostol , obstetrics , vaginal delivery , apgar score , pregnancy , birth weight , concomitant , retrospective cohort study , labor induction , cohort , gynecology , abortion , surgery , oxytocin , prostaglandin e2 , biology , genetics
Induction of labour is a part of an active prenatal care nowadays and the ideal method of that procedure still remains to be identified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of misoprostol vaginal insert as compared to dinoprostone gel for delivery induction in pregnant women without any comorbidities.