z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Interventions to reduce losses in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Leila Barss,
Saeedeh Moayedi-Nia,
Jonathon R. Campbell,
Dick Menzies
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease/the international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. articles traduits en français ...
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.103
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1815-7920
pISSN - 1027-3719
DOI - 10.5588/ijtld.19.0185
Subject(s) - medicine , psychological intervention , meta analysis , latent tuberculosis , tuberculosis , systematic review , medline , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , mycobacterium tuberculosis , nursing , pathology , political science , law
BACKGROUND: Losses can occur throughout the latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cascade of care. This can result in suboptimal rates of effective treatment for LTBI. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect of different interventions to reduce losses in the LTBI cascade before treatment completion. METHODS: We searched several databases for articles reporting outcomes for interventions designed to strengthen the LTBI cascade. We included papers published in English from January 1990 until February 2018. Where possible, estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 30 studies that evaluated 32 different interventions aimed at reducing losses in the LTBI cascade. In pooled analysis, interventions that improved completion of cascade steps included patient incentives (respectively 42 [95% CI 34–51] and 48 [95% CI 15–81] additional patients completing initial assessment and medical evaluation per 100 starting); health care worker education (28 [95% CI 4–52] additional patients initiating initial assessment per 100 identified; home visits (additional 13 [95% CI 4–21] patients completing initial assessment per 100 starting); digital solutions (additional 11 [95% CI 4–21] patients initiating initial assessment per 100 identified); and patient reminders (additional 7 [95% CI 0.3–13] patients completing initial assessment per 100 starting). Several other interventions reduced losses at specific cascade steps, but evidence for these interventions came from single studies and could not be pooled. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is limited evidence that any single intervention significantly improves the LTBI cascade, many studies provide information about effective ways to strengthen it.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here