
Cost Analysis of an In-House Arthroscopic Skills Simulator
Author(s) -
Joshua Hansen,
Corbin Lee,
Bryson Hewins,
Austin MacDonald,
Austin Rasmussen,
Elizabeth Weissbrod,
Joseph Lopreiato,
Brenton R. Franklin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic business
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2771-3040
DOI - 10.55576/job.v2i1.8
Subject(s) - simulation , computer science , certification , physical therapy , medical physics , medicine , law , political science
Objectives: To compare objective costs between an in-house developed arthroscopy simulator and commercially available options.Design: Cost analysis.Setting: Orthopaedic graduate medical education.Patients/Participants: Eight board-certified orthopaedic surgeons and nineteen novice learners.Intervention: Simulation Training.Main outcome measurement: Cost difference between an in-house developed simulator and a commercially available simulator.Results and conclusions: Significant price differences exist between in-house simulator production cost and commercially available simulators. Low-cost, in-house simulators improve access to arthroscopic simulation training for novice learners by reducing up front cost by 29% and reducing recurring costs by over 90% when compared to a similar commercially available option.Level of Evidence: IV; Cost AnalysisKeywords: Education; Simulation; Orthopaedics; Arthroscopy; Simulation Based Learning Theory(J Ortho Business Jan 2022;2(1):7-9)