Open AccessConsiderations of invasive mechanical ventilation in prone position. A narrative review
Author(s) -
Lorena Díaz-Bohada,
Juan Camilo Segura-Salguero,
Nicolás Felipe Garzón-Beltrán,
Daniela Salazar-Balcázar,
Margarita Otálora-Estéban
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
colombian journal of anesthesiology/revista colombiana de anestesiología/revista colombiana de anestesiologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.145
H-Index - 9
eISSN - 2145-4604
pISSN - 0120-3347
DOI - 10.5554/22562087.e1013
Subject(s) - medicine , medline , systematic review , randomized controlled trial , mechanical ventilation , intensive care medicine , position paper , surgery , pathology , political science , law
The evidence regarding logistic considerations and safety events associated with prone position ventilation (PPV) is summarized and a flow diagrama for safe provision of mechanical ventilation in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic is proposed. A review of the literature was conducted in the Medline via Pubmed, Embase, and Lilacs databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database, and Google scholar. Overall, 31 articles were selected for the analysis. The incidence of PPV-related safety events varies between 1% and 11.9% and the most frequent complications are pressure ulcers and airway complications. Early initiation of enteral nutrition is recommended, and transfers are possible in patients on PPV. There is controversy regarding contraindications and recommendations for PPV. Recommendations for its safe provision are based on expert opinions and the establishment of protocols for healthcare staff training. Clinical studies are required to determine which are the recommendations that should be considered for safe and reproducible PPV use during this pandemic.