z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Black-Box Sustainability
Author(s) -
Louis B. Rice
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of sustainable development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1913-9071
pISSN - 1913-9063
DOI - 10.5539/jsd.v4n4p32
Subject(s) - sustainability , meaning (existential) , assemblage (archaeology) , architecture , politics , promulgation , process (computing) , social sustainability , sustainability organizations , sociology , semiotics , field (mathematics) , environmental ethics , business , political science , epistemology , computer science , ecology , law , geography , philosophy , mathematics , archaeology , pure mathematics , biology , operating system

The term ‘sustainable’ has rapidly become a ubiquitous prefix for many contemporary issues, subjects, professions and disciplines. This paper contextualizes the debate by exploring how the term ‘sustainable’ has emerged within the field of architecture.  The paper examines the semiotics of sustainability; how the meaning of this word has been produced from an assemblage of words, signs and practices. Adopting‘Actor-Network Theory’ (ANT) methodology to examine the embedding of sustainability as the dominant paradigm in architecture. The creation of a definition of sustainability has been hybridized into a social, legal, economic, political and scientific framework. A process of ‘sustainabilization’ has occurred not only within architecture but across a number of different subjects. The research investigates how Carbon-dioxide has played an important role in the promulgation of sustainability. The current framework within which ‘sustainability’ operates is currently too narrow and inflexible (i.e. black-boxed) with too much emphasis on CO2.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here