Open AccessReviewers’ Comments in Academic Journal Peer Review Reports: A Speech Act Theory Perspective
Author(s) -
Wee Chun Tan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of english linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1923-8703
pISSN - 1923-869X
DOI - 10.5539/ijel.v11n6p40
Subject(s) - directive , perspective (graphical) , pragmatics , constructive , speech act , psychology , peer review , indirect speech , linguistics , computer science , political science , law , artificial intelligence , philosophy , programming language , operating system , process (computing)
This study sought to investigate the linguistic functions of reviewers’ comments in academic journal peer review reports, primarily from a pragmatics perspective. Drawing on Searle’s (1976) Speech Act Theory (SAT), reviewers’ comments from 20 academic journal peer review reports were qualitatively analysed. The analysis revealed two main types of speech acts, directive and expressive speech acts, underlined the reviewers’ comments. Among the two types of speech acts, the directive speech act was preferred by the majority of the reviewers. It was also found that the expressive speech act was much more prominent when the reviewers provided negative comments. The results obtained suggest the need for a collegial peer review with more positive and constructive suggestions by reviewers.