z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Use of Authentic Assessment to Report Accountability Data on Young Children’s Language, Literacy and Pre-math Competency
Author(s) -
Xin Gao,
Jennifer Grisham-Brown
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international education studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1913-9039
pISSN - 1913-9020
DOI - 10.5539/ies.v4n2p41
Subject(s) - authentic assessment , accountability , psychology , standardized test , literacy , mathematics education , curriculum , test validity , perception , curriculum based measurement , qualitative research , pedagogy , medical education , psychometrics , developmental psychology , curriculum development , medicine , social science , curriculum mapping , neuroscience , sociology , political science , law

This validity study examined the validity of Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System, 2nd Edition (AEPS®), a curriculum-based, authentic assessment for infants and young children. The primary purposes were to: a) examine whether the AEPS® is a concurrently valid tool for measuring young children's language, literacy and pre-math skills for accountability purpose and b) explore teachers' perceptions on using authentic assessment and standardized tests. This was accomplished through implementing both quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings from the study indicated (a) the AEPS® is a concurrently valid (b) there were both advantages and disadvantages of using authentic assessment such as the AEPS® and using standardized tests based on teachers' perceptions, however, the practical issues of using the authentic measure can be addressed by providing in-depth trainings to teachers and increasing teachers' familiarity with their children; and (c) families preferred authentic assessment such as the AEPS® because it is easier.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here