Open Access
Battle for Eurasia and Failure of Vladimir Putin as an Eurasian Leader
Author(s) -
Lady Cecily Grey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
eurasian crossroads
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2713-2528
pISSN - 2713-251X
DOI - 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010210003
Subject(s) - ideology , politics , reign , political economy , competition (biology) , rivalry , historiography , battle , history , law , political science , ancient history , economic history , sociology , ecology , macroeconomics , economics , biology
Since mid-nineteenth century, Eurasian space has always been a place of political and cultural competition of several superpowers’ national meta-narratives. Now the competition continues. Reverse post-colonialism with idea of European Union guilt before former European colonies, Muslim assault on Eurasia, idea of incessant Chinese expansion, Russian idea are the major competitors in ideological tense struggle. That who wins in this struggle, will dominate Eurasia not only in cultural sense, but politically too. A special attention is given in the paper to investigating the “Russian idea,” a set of ideological stories having emerged in late nineteenth – early twentieth centuries within Eurasianism social movement. “Russian idea” has much in common with ideas of Slavophiles as it is to emphasise Russia’s dominating role in Eurasia. The ideological and political influence of Russia on Eurasia reached its apogee at the end of the nineteenth century, during the reign of Alexander III. Now in his international Eurasian politics, Vladimir Putin obviously wishes to be a successor of the last Russian emperors. However, his administration was critically defeated in its Eurasian claims, due to internal ideological insolvency of Putin’s regime in Siberia and external factors such as Chinese economic and trading Crusade on the whole of Eurasia.