z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A randomized, controlled trial of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat overactive bladder and neurogenic bladder patients
Author(s) -
Blayne Welk,
Mary McKibbon
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian urological association journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.477
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1920-1214
pISSN - 1911-6470
DOI - 10.5489/cuaj.6142
Subject(s) - medicine , overactive bladder , randomized controlled trial , urology , tibial nerve , confidence interval , stimulation , transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
We aimed to determine if transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is effective at treating overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms among neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Adult patients were recruited from one of two groups: 1) women with OAB; and 2) patients with neurogenic disease and bladder symptoms. The intervention was stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve, for 30 minutes, three times per week for 12 weeks at home using transcutaneous patch electrodes. The primary outcome was improvement of the patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). We used ANCOVA (with adjustment for baseline values) and followed the intention-to-treat principle; we reported marginal means (MM) and a p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: We recruited 50 patients (OAB n=20, neurogenic bladder n=30); 24 were allocated to the sham group and 26 to the active TTNS group. Baseline characteristics in both groups were similar. At the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the PPBC between sham or active groups: 13% (3/24) of sham patients and 15% (4/26) of active TTNS patients were responders (p=0.77), and the marginal mean of the end-of-study PPBC score was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8–3.7) vs. 2.9 (95% CI 2.5–3.4), respectively (p=0.30). Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes (24-hour pad weight, voiding diary parameters, or condition-specific patient-reported outcomes). The results were similar within the OAB and neurogenic bladder subgroups. Conclusions: TTNS does not appear to be effective for treating urinary symptoms of people with OAB or neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here