z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Incidentalomas of the prostate detected by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Author(s) -
Miles Mannas,
TaeWeon Lee,
Maral Pourghiasian,
Don Wilson,
Peter C. Black
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
canadian urological association journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.477
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1920-1214
pISSN - 1911-6470
DOI - 10.5489/cuaj.5976
Subject(s) - medicine , prostate cancer , prostate , positron emission tomography , malignancy , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , incidentaloma , prostate specific antigen , positron emission tomography computed tomography , nuclear medicine , cancer
Prostate incidentalomas are prostatic lesions suspicious for cancer discovered by imaging patients without a known history of prostatic cancer (CaP) for other reasons. 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET) is used to diagnose, stage and assess response to treatment for numerous cancers, but it is not routinely used for CaP. We aimed to determine the rate of detection of prostate incidentalomas in patients undergoing FDG PET and to evaluate the natural history of these lesions. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all FDG PET scans performed between 2005 and 2017 at a single institution. Patients were selected who had prostatic uptake without a history of prostate cancer. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records to determine how the prostate incidentalomas were further evaluated and define the rate of malignancy. Results: A prostate incidentaloma was identified in 309 (1.0%) of 31 019 FDG PET scans performed on men. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was obtained in 40.1% of patients within six months of prostate incidentaloma detection. Six patients underwent a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate, which identified CaP in one case. Overall, CaP was diagnosed in 33 cases, representing 10.7% of the prostate incidentalomas and 0.1% of the scanned patients. CaP was intermediate- or high-risk in 27 (8.7%) of the prostate incidentalomas. Conclusions: Incidental lesions detected in the prostate by FDG PET may represent clinically significant CaP. Referral to a urologist for further evaluation should be considered if the patient is otherwise in reasonable health.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here