z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Radiographic Diagnosis of Simulated External Root Resorption in Multi-Rooted Teeth: The Influence of Spatial Resolution.
Author(s) -
Mariane Fls Lacerda,
Rafael Binato Junqueira,
Thaísa Mg Lima,
Carolina Oliveira de Lima,
Caroline Fm Girelli,
Francielle Silvestre Verner
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta odontológica latinoamericana/acta odontológica latinoamericana
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1852-4834
pISSN - 0326-4815
DOI - 10.54589/aol.33/1/014
Subject(s) - radiography , root resorption , molar , digital radiography , medicine , orthodontics , dentistry , receiver operating characteristic , mathematics , nuclear medicine , resorption , radiology
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of spatial resolution (line pairs per millimetre - lp/mm) on the diagnosis of simulated external root resorption (ERR) in multi-rooted teeth by using digital periapical radiography. Forty human mandibular molars (80 roots) were used. The roots were divided into the following groups (n = 10): control without root filling (WORF), control with root filling (WRF), small ERRWORF, small ERR-WRF, moderate ERR-WORF, moderate ERR-WRF, extensive ERR-WORF and extensive ERR-WRF. Four digital radiographs (phosphor storage plates - PSP system) were taken of each tooth in three angulations. The PSPs were scanned with 10, 20, 25 and 40 lp/mm. All images were assessed by three endodontists who used a five-point scale for presence and absence of ERR and classified its location (cervical, middle or apical third). ROC curves and one-way ANOVA were performed (p < 0.01). Diagnosis of ERR in nonroot-filled teeth showed higher values of sensitivity for 20 lp/mm and higher values of both specificity and accuracy for 40 lp/mm. In root-filled teeth, sensitivity and accuracy were higher for 25 lp/mm and spatial resolution had no influence on specificity. The best resolution for diagnosis of small and extensive ERR was 25 lp/mm, whereas for moderate ERR, it was 40 lp/mm. Cervical ERR was the most difficult to diagnose, regardless of the spatial resolution. Higher spatial resolutions have improved the radiographic diagnosis of simulated ERR in multi-rooted teeth and this should be considered when performing digital radiographs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here