Open AccessA Critical Review of Adversity Quotient Instruments: Using the Cosmin Checklist
Author(s) -
Di Yang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
higher education and oriental studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2785-9118
DOI - 10.54435/heos.v1i4.31
Subject(s) - checklist , psychology , quality (philosophy) , applied psychology , quotient , computer science , cognitive psychology , mathematics , philosophy , epistemology , pure mathematics
Adversity intelligence and adversity quotient is the critical ability and robust predictor of a person’s success. However, no consensus and generalized instrument have been established. Hence, the study aims to assess the methodological quality and measurement features of the existing tools for adversity intelligence by identifying and evaluating the instruments following the consensus-based standards for selecting health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. From 255 research studies, six tools were eligible by a systematic review of online databases and books. For three or more of the nine COSMIN criteria, only two of the instruments had strong to moderate levels of evidence. Meanwhile, none of the instruments met any of the criteria. These results demonstrate that no single instrument outperforms all others in all circumstances. Tools that will be refined in the future should capture the development, methodology, and quality during the development of the instrument and achieve a high measurement quality and a generalized tool of measuring adversity intelligence.