z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of Remote Proctoring of the Orthopaedic In-training Examination on Scores
Author(s) -
Montri D. Wongworawat,
Maria Incrocci,
Christina Fulgaro Crumlish,
Joel C. Klena
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons. global research and reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2474-7661
DOI - 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00225
Subject(s) - cheating , medicine , test (biology) , psychology , social psychology , biology , paleontology
The pandemic has created an opportunity to explore different testing settings. However, transitioning to remote testing raises concerns about cheating. The possibility of cheating raises concern about the integrity of test psychometrics. In 2020, the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE) was offered using two administration models, with programs having the option to provide physically distanced, in-person, proctored testing or remote testing and online proctoring. We aimed to determine whether scores were higher when the OITE was administered and proctored remotely.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here