z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Preparation of tambacu protein concentrates using different methodologies
Author(s) -
Natieli Inácio Fernandes,
Claucia Aparecida Honorato da Silva,
Gabriela Cristina Ferreira Bueno,
Maria Luiza Rodrigues de Souza,
Elenice Souza dos Reis Goes
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
semina. ciências agrárias
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.268
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1679-0359
pISSN - 1676-546X
DOI - 10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n1p415
Subject(s) - food science , raw material , taste , fish <actinopterygii> , chemistry , moisture , water content , high protein , fish products , chromatography , biology , organic chemistry , fishery , geotechnical engineering , engineering
The aim of this study was to develop methodologies to obtain fish protein concentrates from tambacu filleting residues, characterize their physical-chemical composition and evaluate their sensory profile. Concentrates were prepared by one of three methodologies: cooking of the raw material and subsequent drying (FPC1); cooking, drying, lipid removal with ethanol at 70 °C and final drying (FPC2); and three washing steps of the raw material with ethanol at 70 °C and drying (FPC3). FPC2 had a lower final yield (15.5%) and chroma a* (1.77) and chroma b* values (14.12) but higher moisture (5.22%) and protein content (80.39%) and luminosity (74.97), in addition to having the weakest fish taste compared to FPC1 and FPC3. FPC1 had the strongest odour, darkest colour, and strongest fish taste compared to FPC2 and FPC3. Ash, pH values, and water activity were not different between the concentrates. It is concluded that the methodology where lipid removal steps are carried out after cooking and drying (FPC2) is more effective for the removal of lipids and deodorization of tambacu protein concentrate.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here