z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative study of disease categories: EHR interrogation
Author(s) -
Priscilla O. Okunji,
Nawar Shara,
John Kwagyn,
Ian M. Brooks,
Gina Brown,
Thomas A. Mellman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of nursing education and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-4059
pISSN - 1925-4040
DOI - 10.5430/jnep.v9n9p50
Subject(s) - health insurance portability and accountability act , software portability , medicine , interoperability , data sharing , medical emergency , health records , clinical trial , confidentiality , health care , computer science , alternative medicine , computer security , world wide web , political science , pathology , law , programming language
Objective: Although the advancement of electronic health records (EHRs) utilization in clinical research may allow for feasibility studies, and identify patients who are eligible for enrollment in clinical trials, it is a complex process to conduct clinical and translational research studies by merging data from different EMRs. Barriers and challenges such as data interoperability, lack of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant platforms for data integration, and the lack of real efforts to resolve these issues make it harder to conduct these studies. However, it is imperative to note that leveraging EHRs to counterbalance these challenges is an area of intense interest and data sharing from hospitals may enable clinical research with large samples for a moderate or large effect size. To inform this issue, we worked across urban hospitals with data extracted from different systems, for patients diagnosed with diabetes and myocardial infarction, in the year 2013.Methods: Using ICD 9 codes for diabetes (25,000) and myocardial infarction (41,000), data were extracted from urban hospitals. The data were then cleaned, merged using common fields, and analyzed. It is important to note that ICD 9 was used instead of ICD 10 because one of the hospitals had an already existing dataset extracted from EHR using ICD 9. In addition, the hospital with the ICD 9 dataset provided the original data with the needed variables prior to the grant application that made this project possible.Results: The result showed that patients discharged in 2013 from the selected urban hospitals with MI, were 3.8 times more likely to die while in admission and 4.2 times in MI+DM patients. However, race and gender were not significant in the adjusted model. Variables that impacted this critical result were age of the patients, followed by low density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure and body mass index.Conclusions: Comparative studies for preliminary studies through EHR interrogation is the future. This project has confirmed that similar studies should be encouraged and may lead to preventive health education that may ultimately prevent higher mortality rate in certain population. This project is a proof of concept of how data from different EHR platforms can be used to conduct a comparative study by a direct hospitals EHR interrogation, without additional time needed in bedside data collection or purchase of already collected datasets.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here