z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of self-care of heart failure index
Author(s) -
Jin Shil Kim,
Minjeong An,
Hyojeong Seo,
Seon Young Hwang,
Jae Lan Shim
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of nursing education and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-4059
pISSN - 1925-4040
DOI - 10.5430/jnep.v8n10p96
Subject(s) - structural equation modeling , cronbach's alpha , confirmatory factor analysis , reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , scale (ratio) , context (archaeology) , psychometrics , clinical psychology , medicine , statistics , mathematics , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
Purpose: Self-care and associated decisions for therapeutic recommendations have been a focus of attention recently in Korea. The purpose of this study was to address the dimensionality and reliability of a Korean version of Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI v.6.2), a measure of self-care of patients with heart failure within a clinical context.Methods: The study sample completed 120 surveys that consisted of demographic variables and the SCHFI v.6.2, which was created to measure self-care maintenance, self-care management, and self-care confidence in HF patients. Confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus verified a robust structural fit of the three dimensionality for each subscale.Results: Self-care maintenance, CFI = .92, TLI = .88, SRMR = .06, RMSEA = .07; self-care management, CFI = .93, TLI = .78, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .24; self-care confidence, CFI = .95, TLI = .92, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .13. Multidimensionality yielded the self-care maintenance scale having 4-factor structures, while each self-care management and confidence scale had a unidimensionality. Reliability estimates using methods compatible with each scale’s dimensionality were adequate to high, ranging from .71 to .96.Conclusions: Psychometric testing of the SCHFI demonstrates a sound model fit, with desirable reliability estimates given each scale dimensionality, using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and alternative options.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here