Open AccessEvaluating intentional quality rounding for undergraduate student nurse training during COVID-19
Author(s) -
Shea Polancich,
Connie WhiteWilliams,
Laura Steadman,
Kaitrin Parris,
Gwen V. Childs,
Terri Poe,
Linda Moneyham
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of nursing education and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-4059
pISSN - 1925-4040
DOI - 10.5430/jnep.v12n5p47
Subject(s) - nursing , coursework , nurse education , bachelor , rounding , likert scale , quality (philosophy) , nursing outcomes classification , medical education , psychology , patient safety , medicine , team nursing , computer science , health care , developmental psychology , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , economics , history , economic growth , operating system
Nursing’s body of knowledge is ever expanding, incorporating new theoretical constructs such as quality and safety and care transitions we now consider central to the domain of nursing, and to nursing clinical education. The purpose of this article is to describe an educational quality improvement project, an alternative clinical learning experience during COVID-19 that enabled the implementation and evaluation of Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students in an intentional quality rounding process. We designed and implemented a retrospective, observational quality improvement educational project. Programmatic evaluation was used to obtain feedback from 273 pre-licensure students using a 10-item Likert scale evaluation tool in June 2020. Students averaged a 4.33 rating on the evaluation of the intentional quality rounding clinical experience as something they should incorporate into future nursing practice. A critical role for nursing education is the development of innovative teaching strategies and learning experiences that facilitate the student in the translation and application of complex constructs from nursing’s expanding body of knowledge, a task made more difficult by the COVID-19 pandemic.