Open AccessCOMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SYNTHETIC AND BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PEST AND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES ON COTTON CROP
Author(s) -
M. A. Baker,
Arif Hamid Makhdum,
M. Maqsud Nasir,
Asad Imran,
Abrar Ahmad,
F. Tufail
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of mountain area research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2518-850X
pISSN - 2518-8496
DOI - 10.53874/jmar.v1i0.6
Subject(s) - pyriproxyfen , azadirachta , toxicology , biology , pest analysis , integrated pest management , pest control , agronomy , pesticide , horticulture
The Synthetic and botanical insecticides are relatively safer for environment and beneficial insects. The study was conducted in Rahim Yar Khan during the cotton cropping season 2014 to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two Synthetic insecticides i.e. Nitenpyram (Jasper 10% SL) and Pyriproxyfen (Bruce 10.8% EC) and two botanical extracts of Calotropic procera and Azadirachta indica, against sucking insect pest complex of cotton and their natural enemies. Upon reaching economic thresholds, the recommended field doses of all the insecticides were applied on cotton cultivar MNH-886. Data against sucking pests and their natural enemies was recorded 24 hours prior to insecticidal application and then 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after insecticidal application. Results revealed that Nitenpyram was much toxic against sucking pests followed by Pyriproxyfen as compared to two botanical extracts. On the other hand, the synthetic insecticides did not prove safer for natural enemies as compared to botanical extracts. It was concluded that as an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy, botanical extracts can be used at low infestation levels so that ecosystem service of biological control may be sustained.