
Notas sobre a dicotomia “inato” versus “aprendido”
Author(s) -
Marcus Bentes de Carvalho Neto,
Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
interação em psicologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.105
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 1981-8076
pISSN - 1981-8068
DOI - 10.5380/psi.v5i1.3320
Subject(s) - psychology , philosophy , humanities
The literature that concentrates on the debate surrounding “innate” versus “learnt” in the determination of the behavioural phenomenon is often paradoxical: whilst stating that there is an unequivocal interaction between “biological” and “environmental” factors (which are indissoluble), also suggests that these different instances may act in an independent manner in the constitution and determination of the actions of organisms. This paper represents an attempt t achieve conceptual clarification regarding the validity or otherwise of this dichotomy based on the treatment of the matter by B. F. Skinner and K. Lorenz. Three different dyads are suggested (“genes” & “environment”; “philogenesis” & “ontogenesis”; “innate behaviour” & “learnt behaviour”), where the dichotomy may or may not be adequate. Keywords: Innate versus learnt; radical behaviourism; classical ethology; environmentalism versus innatism