
Discriminação com Três Diferentes Contingências em SΔ: Extinção, Reforçamento e Punição, Extinção e Punição
Author(s) -
Marcus Bentes de Carvalho Neto,
Juliane Rufino da Costa,
Romariz da Silva Barros,
Danielle Chaves de Farias,
Viviane Verdu Rico
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
interação em psicologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.105
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 1981-8076
pISSN - 1981-8068
DOI - 10.5380/psi.v17i2.26176
Subject(s) - physics , psychology
Previous studies reported better efficacy in discrimination training when electric shock (used as punisher or as negative reinforcer stimulus) was combined with extinction in presence of SΔ. The present study explored the generality of such data with Hot Air Blast (HAB). In Experiment 1, three groups of two rats learned discrimination between light (SΔ) versus dark (SD) under three different contingencies for SΔ: extinction, reinforcement+punishment, and extinction+punishment. The data showed more training efficacy when combining punishment and extinction. In Experiment 2, the functions of light and dark stimuli were reversed. The data showed equivalence between punishment and extinction+punishment, with both more efficient than extinction alone. Generally, the data confirm the efficacy of arranging punishment contingencies combined with extinction in presence of SΔ in context of discrimination training with HBA as aversive stimulus, increasing the generality of the phenomenon