z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Seymour
Author(s) -
Ildikó Limpár
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the anachronist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2063-126X
pISSN - 1219-2589
DOI - 10.53720/conp2199
Subject(s) - perfection , intellect , ideal (ethics) , contradiction , character (mathematics) , id, ego and super ego , publishing , aesthetics , key (lock) , point (geometry) , gesture , sociology , literature , art , psychology , psychoanalysis , philosophy , epistemology , computer science , linguistics , geometry , mathematics , computer security
In his rare interviews, Salinger explains his choice of retiring from publication as a private person; his stories, in contrast, provide an insight into the author’s intellect, and allow us to realize the artist’s motivation for writing only for the sake of writing. The present paper focuses on the artistic principles of the two author characters in Salinger’s oeuvre, Buddy and Seymour Glass, considering them as the alter-ego and the artistic ideal of the author, respectively. First the Glass’s way of communication is presented, emphasizing the importance of key concepts, such as perfection and the method of not-aiming. Then Seymour’s suicide is investigated, making the point that it should not be considered as the poet’s act aiming at ultimate perfection in his existence but as an act of a person seriously harmed by his war experiences. Therefore, Seymour is a contradictory character, shown as a perfect artist and a failed man. Ultimately, the paper suggests that Salinger saw the contradiction between his ideal and reality’s limitations, which explains his attitude to publishing and his gesture of granting Buddy the authorship of his own Seymour stories.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here