z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of Training Course on “Integrated Management of Neonatal & Childhood Illness” (IMNCI) Using Kirkpatrick Model at Level-2
Author(s) -
Muhammad Haroon Hamid,
Muhammad Afzal,
Sana Khan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health professions educator journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-1151
pISSN - 2664-1143
DOI - 10.53708/hpej.v4i1.100
Subject(s) - test (biology) , medicine , wilcoxon signed rank test , mann–whitney u test , exact test , family medicine , surgery , paleontology , biology
Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMNCI), taught by a 6-day training course, is an important initiative to decrease childhood mortality. Level 2 of the Kirkpatrick model entails the assessment of the learning achieved by training activity.Objective: To assess improvement in the knowledge of IMNCI content among the participants of the 6-day IMNCI training program.Methods: After taking approval from IRB, this one-group pre-test-post-test study was carried out in the Paediatrics Medicine Department, King Edward Medical University / Mayo Hospital Lahore over 3 months. By non-probability consecutive sampling, all 77 participants of three 6-day courses (with no previous formal training of IMNCI) were included in the study. To assess any improvement in the knowledge (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2), each participant filled a pre-test and a similar post-test after the training.Data was analyzed by SPSS software. As the data was not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon test was applied to compare the overall median scores of pre-test and post-test. Kruskal-Wallis Test was applied for the comparison of the median scores of pre-test and post-test scores of each professional group. While Mann-Whitney U-test was applied for pairwise comparison of the pre-test and post-test scores between different pairs of professional groups.Results: Of the 77 participants, there were 35 doctors, 20 nurses, 20 Lady Health Visitors, and 2 midwives. The overall median score was 3 (IQR 3) of the pre-test and 8 (IQR 2) for the post-test (p-value < 0.001). Except for the midwives, there was a statistically significant improvement in the median score of each group. Item-analysis of the questions showed that compared to the pre-test, the proportion of correct answers in the post-test showed statistically significant improvement for all the 10 questions. Pairwise comparison of the median pre-test and post-test scores between different professional groups did not show statistical significance except for the doctor-nurse pair.Conclusion: IMNCI training program significantly increased the knowledge of health care providers with no statistical difference between the post-test scores of doctors, LHVs, and midwives. KEYWORDS: IMNCI, Training program, Kirkpatrick Model, Childhood mortality, Knowledge evaluation  

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here